Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 1

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Dedication in FE (→GE,EE1) & EE3

No dedication in EE2

..

EE2 did not include the dedication, yet it was reintroduced already in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Dedications

b. 1

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

The engraver of GE mistook the order of the digits in the metronome marking, placing '48' instead of '84.'

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Metronome tempos

b. 1

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In this case, the missing dynamic marking at the beginning of the piece, quite rare in Chopin's pieces, indicates, according to us, dynamics in between  and . In order to mark such dynamics, Chopin would use the m.v. (mezza voce) abbreviation; however, he was reluctant to do it at the beginning of the piece – cf. the Impromptu in A MajorOp. 29. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: No initial dynamic marking

b. 4

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Long accent in #Wf (→#Wn)

Short accent in EE

..

A precise differentiation between long and short accents, typical of Chopin's notation, and assigning them to the right or left hand is impossible due to the missing autograph and visible inaccuracies of the first editions. In FE, it is possible to observe differences between accents in some cases; it also applies to GE to a lesser extent. In turn, the reviser of EE reproduced almost all accents as short. It is impossible to clearly identify in which places the notation of FE reproduces Chopin's notation faithfully (which can also be imprecise) and in which ones the length of the accent results from a random event or an inaccuracy. We try to reproduce the composer's intention taking into account his habits in this respect, documented by sources in other compositions.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 5

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the absence of [A], it is difficult to determine whether the curved line over the g notes in FE (→GE,EE) is a tie sustaining those notes or a motivic slur (in Chopin's autographs, the differentiation is possible due to the shape of the curved lines). According to us, it is a motivic slur that is more likely here.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Tie or slur